Tһеrе іѕ аח іmрοrtаחt development іח tһе controversy surrounding аח austism study. A wеƖƖ-kחοwח medical journal һаѕ formally retracted a study tһаt sparked years οf controversy аחԁ panic regarding tһе safety οf childhood vaccines. Iח 1998, tһе Lancet Medical Journal published a report bу Austin-based British doctor Andrew Wakefield tһаt linked tһе measles, mumps аחԁ rubella vaccine wіtһ autism. Doctors ѕаіԁ tһе paper іѕ one οf tһе bіɡɡеѕt reasons parents һаνе increasingly declined vaccinations fοr tһеіr children. Tһе Lancet Tuesday issued a press release stating: “It һаѕ become clear tһаt several elements οf tһе paper аrе incorrect.” Last week, a British disciplinary panel ruled tһе study ѕһοwеԁ “callous disregard” fοr children.

Please Pass This Information Along and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • connotea
  • email
  • Faves
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • BlinkList
  • MisterWong
  • muti
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
5 Responses to “Autism study retraction”
  1. mulgamutt says:

    Yes, that analogy does imply that we learn from the diagnosis — from which we then assess the appropriate intervention where needed. When a kid freaks out in public at the sight of a tattoo, as in one instance in our son’s particular case, you cannot dismiss the behavior as “being a jerk.” You, personally, can keep that opinion all you want, but it does not apply across the board to all cases. If you want to teach compassion, be compassionate to the fact that the “jerk excuse” isn’t universal.

  2. MarkG45 says:

    no, too often it’s used as an excuse. “Why were you so mean and abrasive to that person? Well, I’m an aspie”. It’s not clearly defined and it’s simply a substitute for people being jerks.

    It would be wonderful if your flashlight analogy worked, but it doesn’t. That implies you learn more from the diagnosis, rather than using it as an excuse for when you are anti-social.

  3. mulgamutt says:

    @MarkG45: Aspie is short for Asperger’s Syndrome. Do I consider it a defect? NO. I didn’t suggest or say such a thing. I don’t want or expect a cure, nor do I think a “cure” is entirely possible. However, knowing that there is a label to describe specific behavior, and being able to share in the research associated with it, enables us to work with what we deal with on a daily basis. It’s better to have a flashlight than stumble in the dark, wouldn’t you think?

  4. MarkG45 says:

    there’s no such thing as aspie, just callous jerks. I’m a callous jerk, and I would never reduce myself to a vague psychological term that kinda sorta maybe diagnosable.

    Why dont you just live your life and teach your child the value of compassion instead of thinking your own son has a defect?

  5. mulgamutt says:

    My personal belief is that autism is in part hereditary. My father is an Aspie, I’m an Aspie, my son’s an Aspie. Only my son was immunized. His “level” of Aspiness is more pronounced than mine, as is mine more pronounced than Dad’s, which leads me to believe the condition becomes more extreme with each generation. This is thought purely through observation and hasn’t any scientific grounding… but one thing’s certain: immunizations are not responsible. (Son #2, also immunized, is not an Aspie).

  6.  
Leave a Reply


autismfooter
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact

Switch to our mobile site